The Genetic Engineering Information Bulletin: an independent, widely sourced digest of information relevant to the genetic engineering (GE) debate  
 
Home
  GE Info Bulletins  
   
  Return to Bulletin 49  
  Support  
 
No. 49 October 2006


India: Supreme Court steps in to tighten GM crop test norms
05.oct.06
Times of India


NEW DELHI: Fresh field trials of genetically modified crops are on hold. The Supreme Court has directed the government that it should not give any fresh approvals to GM crop field trials until further orders.
GM crops is an issue that has cleaved the scientific community. Field trials of GM crops are governed by stringent regulations around the world, including most of Europe where GM food has not passed muster despite immense pressure from biotech giants.
In India, the regulatory structure for field trials is strict in theory, but in practice, scandalously lax. This is what the Supreme Court discovered on September 22 when it issued its order against fresh field trials.
Soon thereafter, agriculture minister Sharad Pawar — a votary of GM foods — also admitted that food safety and environment risks should be assessed on a "strict scientific basis" for GM crops.
GM crops have been mired in controversy for several years across the world despite claims of high yield and reduced dependence on pesticides.
Currently in India, many blame the farmer distress in cotton-growing areas on high-priced GM seeds that failed to deliver on their promise, leaving the farmer badly indebted.
Who allows field tests of GM crops in India? Until May 1, permission was being given by the review committee of genetic manipulation (RCGM) under the department of biotechnology, the very same department that promotes GM technology.
The obvious conflict of interest was highlighted in a PIL filed by activist Aruna Rodrigues.
The apex court went into the issue and discovered that under the 1989 rules framed under the Environment Protection Act, permission for field trials was actually meant to be granted by the genetic engineering approval committee (GEAC) under the environment ministry.
Intervening for the first time on May 1, the Supreme Court ordered that only GEAC could clear field trials. But in the event, GEAC turned out to be a mere rubber stamp.
In its four meetings since the May 1 order, GEAC cleared as many as 142 proposals of multi-locational field trials.
The range of crops under test includes vegetables and food grains: brinjal, maize, mustard, sugar cane, sorghum, rice, tomato, potato, banana, papaya, cauliflower, oilseeds, castor, soyabean, chick-pea and medicinal plants.
Rodrigues went to the court again, this time to draw attention to GEAC's failure to exercise due diligence while clearing proposals for field trials.

Web Link: http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/articleshow/2091187.cms

Note that direct links to the source are provided wherever possible. Otherwise, a link to a web-posted copy on a 3rd party site is given.
Sometimes these links will expire, so the above archived copy will be the only reference.

** NOTICE: In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed for research and educational purposes only. **

 

   
 
 

From The GE Information Service
The items in this bulletin are from articles which remain the copyright of the original owners. The material is published here for educational and public interest use only.


Hard copies of the Bulletin are available.
Single issues can be purchased for $5. You can also take out an annual subscription, covering a minimum of 10 issues, for $35.


The GE Information Bulletin is a project of the GE Information Service. It presents a regular digest of significant information from an international range of sources.
We rely on donations, grants and sponsorship. Please support our work to promote informed debate regarding the responsible use of genetic engineering.
Supporters have no editorial influence.

 


The GE Information Service
PO Box 78121, Grey Lynn
Auckland, New Zealand

Editor:
Stuart Sontier
Email:
editor@GEinfo.org.nz